Loading the Climate Dashboard…
About Climate Dashboard·Read any city's climate as a set of design decisions.
What Climate Dashboard does
Reads an EnergyPlus Weather file and turns it into a climate brief: what the climate is, the numbers that matter, and a ranked list of what it asks of the building. Every finding links to the chart that proves it. All computed in your browser, with no AI needed.
- Input:
- .epw / .zip
- Layers:
- Brief · Evidence · Hand-off
- Output:
- Design findings + charts
How it works
An EPW file carries its own ground truth — an ASHRAE design-conditions header and a .stat sidecar generated from the same 8760 rows. That makes every number here checkable against the file itself, and it is: any disagreement is unambiguously our error, not a different station or period of record. A second harness checks the derived physics against the published reference libraries.
- Psychrometrics per the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, checked against PsychroLib 1.1.1: worst wet-bulb error 0.0009 K, worst dew-point error 0.0012 K.
- Solar position from a Meeus-based implementation, checked against pvlib's NREL SPA: worst altitude error 0.012°, worst azimuth error 0.073°.
- Wind-rose sector binning and ASHRAE 55 adaptive comfort checked against ladybug-core / ladybug-comfort — exact agreement, to 1e-9 K on the comfort temperatures.
- 12,822 automated checks against those three libraries: 12,822 PASS, 0 FAIL.
- 1,037 checks against the EPW's own header and .stat sidecar: 1,036 PASS, 0 FAIL, 1 SKIP (no reference available).
- Bioclimatic strategy zones are additionally benchmarked by hand against Climate Consultant 6.0.4, which has no scriptable interface.
How to use it
- Load a climate file. Pick a station on the map or drop your own .epw or .zip.
- Read the brief. The climate named, six headline numbers, the year at a glance, and ranked design findings. Enough on its own for most projects.
- Check the evidence. Four sections by design question: heat and cold, sun and sky, wind, water and humidity. Each opens on one chart, with the rest behind More detail.
- Take it further. Open the same station in Sun Path, Daylight, U-Value, Wind or PV, copy the link, or print the brief.
- Ask the advisor. Optional. The advisor discusses the findings; it never gates them.
Best used for
- Opening a project on an unfamiliar site and knowing within minutes what the climate asks of the building.
- Backing a design decision with the chart that proves it, in a report or a crit.
- Picking the station and design conditions the rest of your analysis will run on.
- Teaching climate-responsive design from real data rather than a textbook diagram.
Not a substitute for
- Predicting a specific future year — an EPW is a typical year assembled from history, not a forecast.
- Energy-code compliance documentation.
- Microclimate at your exact site: the station may be kilometres away, at a different elevation, and usually at an airport.
Known limits
- A typical meteorological year smooths away the extremes an actual year contains. Design conditions in the header, not the 8760 rows, are what you size plant against.
- Station representativeness is the dominant error, and it is not one this tool can measure for you — check the distance and elevation before trusting a number to the degree.
- Older EPWs can predate the current climate by decades; the period of record is in the header and worth reading.
- Bioclimatic zones follow Givoni-style boundaries, which are conventions rather than physics — treat the strategy list as a prompt, not a specification.